Local game-based instruction and literacy development among Tanzanian English learners: A pre-post correlational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2026.31.1.19Keywords:
early literacy, game-based instruction, literacy intervention, reading–writing relationship, writing and writing skillsAbstract
Purpose. This study examined the relationships between reading and writing skills and the predictive role of reading subskills in writing performance before and after a local games-based literacy intervention. The study focused on primary school pupils with low baseline literacy levels and adopted a post-method pedagogical perspective.
Methodology. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design involving two experimental schools and one control school was employed in the study. Pupils utilised a local games-based English instructions for five-months. Pre- and post-test data were analysed with Pearson correlations and multiple regression to examine reading–writing relationships and predictors of writing performance.
Results. Prior to the intervention, reading and writing skills were highly interdependent across multiple subskills. After the intervention, a distinguished transformation emerged. The correlations between reading and writing measures weakened, while relationships within the writing domain strengthened. Moreover, the reading comprehension emerged as the sole significant predictor of all writing outcomes, with the variance explained by reading subskills decreasing substantially for letter writing (from 63.1% to 19.9%) and word writing (from 47.5% to 12.7%). In contrast, text writing remained strongly associated with reading comprehension.
Conclusions. Local games-based instruction enhanced autonomy in foundational writing skills while maintaining the role of comprehension in complex tasks. The study supports culturally responsive, game-based pedagogies, aligned with post-method principles, as a way to transform reading–writing relationships in resource-limited contexts.
Downloads
References
Barrett, A. M., Biseko, J. M., Clegg, J., Mbwafu, F. A., Ndabakurane, J. J., Sane, E., Wayimba, S. J., & Bowden, R. (2024). Language learning across transition in the language of learning and teaching: An analysis of the Tanzanian curriculum (Bristol Working Papers in Education No. 03/2024). School of Education, University of Bristol. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11233387
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104
Brock-Utne, B. (2015). Language, literacy, power and democracy in Africa. Education and Society, 33(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.7459/es/33.2.02
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3501_5
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading: A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act report. Alliance for Excellent Education. https://www.carnegie.org/publications/writing-to-read-evidence-for-how-writing-can-improve-reading/
Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A Meta‐Analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
Kim, Y. G., & Zagata, E. (2024). Enhancing Reading and Writing Skills through Systematically Integrated Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 77(6), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2307
Kim, Y. S. G., & Graham, S. (2022). Expanding the Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Writing (DIEW): Reading–writing relations, and dynamic relations as a function of measurement/dimensions of written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000564
Kim, Y.-S. G., Petscher, Y., Wanzek, J., & Otaiba, S. A. (2018). Relations between reading and writing: A longitudinal examination from grades 3 to 6. Reading and Writing, 31(7), 1591–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9855-4
Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Libraries Unlimited. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247950880
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2002). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1np6r2
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615725
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analysing, recognising, doing, and seeing. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833474
Kwambaza, C. (2024). Teachers’ views on the importance of critical thinking skills in early childhood education in Tanzania. Educational Challenges, 29(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.2.12
Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question. Teachers College Press. https://surl.li/mrtdbi
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492
Lusianov, J. D. (2020). Post-Method era and Glocalization in language teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 360–366). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.056
Mallette, M. H., & Duke, N. K. (2020). Literacy research methodologies (3rd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/747823
Ndijuye, L. G., & Beatus, J. (2022). The rural and urban divide in early literacy acquisition in Tanzania: the mediating roles of home and school contexts. Education 3-13, 52(8), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2145851
Omollo, A., Matete, R., & Loisulie, P. (2024). Components in lesson planning for secondary school teachers in Tanzania: Implications for supervision and teachers’ training. Educational Challenges, 29(2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.2.20
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
Reinhardt, J. (2019). Gameful second and foreign language teaching and learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04729-0
Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). Guilford Press.
Shanahan, T. (2016). Relationships between reading and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 194–207). Guilford Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (2004). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 243–262). Guilford Press.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wilfred Madata, John Misana Biseko, & Jesse Julius Ndabakurane

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.