Curriculum Fidelity of English Language Teaching Teachers and Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation at Ethiopian Public Universities’ Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.02Keywords:
Adaptation, Adherence, Fidelity, Freshman English, Implementation ApproachesAbstract
This study aimed to explore English Language Teaching (ELT) teachers’ fidelity to the designed freshman English curriculum.
A mixed method research design, where the quantitative data served to support the qualitative one, was used in the study. A . One-to-one interviews, observations, and post-observation interviews were used as data collection instruments. Verbatim transcription was made for the qualitative data. Then, the relevant data was categorized and the data not relevant to the present purpose was bracketed. Categories seemed to be mutually exclusive, however, and analysis was made by making connections between or among the various categories.
The result showed that ELT teachers followed the fidelity perspective by adhering to the contents of the official curriculum even in circumstances where adaptations were required. However, teachers’ fidelity to the designed curriculum or to the official curriculum was offset by teachers decision to skip certain activities. ELT teachers’ adherence was imposed by different factors, including a high-stakes exam, alignment problems with instruction and assessment, the use of students’ scores for placement, relevance and repetition of activities, and lack of training. Personal/teacher factors (teachers’ beliefs, confidence, knowledge, and skills in improving the curriculum) and student factors (motivation and interest) also had significant influence.
It can be concluded that ELT teachers missed one of the significant professional roles they could play during curriculum implementation – adapting contents based on the classroom context. Professional development training should be proffered to ELT teachers. In addition, institutional needs and teachers’ freedom to improve the curriculum at the classroom level need to be balanced.
Downloads
References
Azano, A., Missett, T. C., Callahan, C. M., Oh, S., Brunner, M., Foster, L. H., & Moon, T. R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between fidelity of implementation and academic achievement in a third-grade gifted curriculum: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(5), 693-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11424878
Backer, T. E. (2001). Finding the Balance – Program Fidelity and Adaptation in Substance Abuse Prevention: A State-of-the Art Review. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Rockville, MD.
Blessing, L.T.M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
Bumen, N. T., Cakar, E., & Yildiz, D. G. (2020). Curriculum Fidelity and Factors Affecting Fidelity in the Turkish Context. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.2020.
Cho, J. (1998). Rethinking curriculum implementation: Paradigms, models and teachers’ work. The Ohio State University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED421767.pdf
Clemente, M., Ramirez, E., & Dominguez, B. (2000). The selection of contents in school projects in Spain. Curriculum Inquiry, 3(30), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00167.
Combs, K. M., Buckley, P. R., Lain, M. A., Drewelow, K. M., Urano, G., & Kerns, S. E. U. (2022). Influence of Classroom-Level factors on implementation fidelity during scale-up of Evidence-Based interventions. Prevention Science (Print), 23(6), 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01375-3
Daro, D., & Cohn-Donnelly, A. (2001). Child abuse prevention: Accomplishments and challenges. In J. Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, T. Hendrix, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment: Second Edition (pp. 431-448). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). An inside look at success for all- A qualitative study of implementation and teaching and learning. Baltimore, MD: The Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk. https://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report45
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation Matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Hansen, W. B., Walsh, J., & Falco, M. (2005). Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions, Health Education Research, 20(3), 308- 313. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg134
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335–397. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335
Gibbs, G., & Habeshaw, T. (1989). Preparing to teach: An introduction to effective teaching in HE. TES.
Graves, K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching, 41(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444807004867
Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Gray, D. E. (2009). Doing research in the real world (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (1999). Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(5), 711–731. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022194005511
Hill, L., Maucione, K., & Hood, B. K. (2006). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0051-4
Hlebowitsh, P. S. (2005). Designing the School Curriculum. Pearson, Boston.
Hongboontri, C., & Darling, W. E. (2020). EFL Curriculum Implementation: An Exploratory Study into Teachers and Students’ Perceptions. Horizon Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.37534/bp.jhssr.2020.v2.n1.id1015.p69
Imran, S., & Wyatt, M. (2019). Curriculum-making and development in a Pakistani University. The Qualitative Report, 24(10), 2506-2519. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3808
Iskandar, I. (2020). Teachers’ fidelity to curriculum: an insight from teachers’ implementation of the Indonesian EFL curriculum policy. IJHI (International Journal of Humanities and Innovation) (Online), 3(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v3i2.79
James Bell Associates (2009, October). Evaluation brief: Measuring implementation fidelity. Arlington, VA: Author.
Jamshed, S. Q. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87-88. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
Lee, O., Penfield, R. D., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Effects of fidelity of implementation on science achievement gains among english language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (Print), 46(7), 836–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20335
Lee, Y., & Chue, S. (2013). The value of fidelity of implementation criteria to evaluate School-Based Science Curriculum Innovations. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2508–2537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.609189
Mangali, Z., & Hamdan, A. R. (2015). Barriers to implementing English school based curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(4), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss4.351
McNeill, K. L., Marco-Bujosa, L., González‐Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2018). Teachers’ enactments of curriculum: Fidelity to Procedure versus Fidelity to Goal for scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1455–1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1482508
Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400302400303
O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793
Ocak, G., & Olur, B. (2019). The development of the curriculum fidelity scale. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i4/6480
Seneechai, W. (2020). EFL Teachers’ Approaches and Factors to Curriculum Implementation at a Classroom Level: A Review. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 8(3), 261-265. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i3/HS2003-083
Shawer, S. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015
Shawer, S. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.017
Shawer, S., Gilmore, D., & Banks-Joseph, S. (2009). Learner-Driven ELT Curriculum Development at the Classroom Level. The International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 20(2), 125-143. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ864331.pdf
Shawer, S., Gilmore, D., & Banks-Joseph, S. R. (2008). Student cognitive and affective development in the context of classroom-level curriculum development. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1-28. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1690
Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312025001001
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In Philip W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 402-435). Macmillan.
Suyanto, S. (2017). A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 100008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995218
Verster, M., Mentz, E., & Du Toit-Brits, C. (2018). A theoretical perspective on the requirements of the 21st century for teachers’ curriculum as praxis. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 9(1), 2825–2832. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0372
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Baye Ashebir Anteneh, Alemu Hailu Anshu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
_logo_late_2025.svg.png){kind=logo}
