Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Smarter Learning Environments in the New Age of Digital Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.10Keywords:
Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, Class Resource Management, Model of Smarter Learning Environments, New-Age Digital Transformation, Preliminary Framework for Smart Learning EnvironmentsAbstract
The fully online and electronic environments of today as the only way of teaching/learning require some reviews and appraisals of the paradigms of digital transformation, including the paradigm of smart education. Therefore, the current study investigated the paradigm change of the smart education to the smarter education, leading to the review of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL).
Purpose. The current study intends to update both the traditional theories and practice of TEFL in the new age of digital transformation, which will have effective theoretical and empirical implications in the practice of TEFL in smarter learning environments.
Methodology. The present study was designed in two phases and employed a qualitative methodology with a descriptive design. It tried to answer how this paradigm change affects the theories of TEFL.
Results. In the first phase of the study, the Preliminary Framework for Smart Learning Environments by Spector was adapted and expanded into the Model of Smarter Learning Environments based on the challenges and opportunities brought about by the new age of digital transformation. The second phase involved reviewing Krashen’s Acquisition/Learning Hypothesis, exploring its relevance and applicability to TEFL in the context of the Model of Smarter Learning Environments. The aim of this phase was to identify the potential challenges and opportunities associated with managing TEFL classroom resources within this new framework.
The investigation concluded that the mandatory application of fully online teaching, in the case of TEFL, which resulted from the New-Age Digital Transformation, requires reviewing the traditional theories of Second Language Learning and Teaching. It has created challenges and opportunities in the class resource management. Finally, providing digital facilities and training was proposed as a solution to the challenges.
Downloads
References
Abbasova, M., & Mammadova, N. (2019). The role of digital technology in English language teaching in Azerbaijan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p364
Abukhattala, I. (2013). Krashen’s five proposals on language learning: Are they valid in Libyan EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 128–131. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p128
Alwehebi, K. A. (2021). The effect of online EFL classes during the Covid 19 pandemic: Evaluating the performance of university students and teachers in Saudi Arabia. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.95
Anderson, T. (2011). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). AU Press.
Bahari, A. (2020). CANDA: computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805774
Bickerton, D, Stenton, T. & Temmermann, M. (2001). Criteria for the evaluation of authoring tools in language education. In A. Chambers & G. Davies (Eds.), ICT and Language Learning: A European Perspective (pp. 53–66). Swets & Zeitlinger.
Bickerton, D. (1999). Authoring and the academic linguist: the challenge of MMCALL. In K. Cameron (Ed.) CALL: Media, Design and Applications (pp. 59–79). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. http://www.camsoftpartners.co.uk/docs/LLAS_Web_Guide.htm
Chomsky, N. (1980). On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and Learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press.
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Felix, U. (2001). Beyond babel: Language learning online. Language Australia.
Franzen, M.D. (2011). Test reliability. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology (pp. 2496–2497). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_2241
Guion, R. M. (1980). On trinitarian doctrines of validity. Professional Psychology 11, 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.11.3.385
Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Johns, T., & King, P. (Eds.) (1991). Classroom concordancing. Special Issue of ELR Journal 4. University of Birmingham: Centre for English Language Studies. https://books.google.com/books/about/Classroom_Concordancing.html?id=AaMSGwAACAAJ
Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Heinemann.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. New York: Pergamon Press.
Küçükler, Halil (2020). Digital transformation in foreign language education. Iğd Üniv Sos Bil Der / Igd Univ Jour Soc Sci Sayı, 23, 635–646. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/igdirsosbilder/issue/66830/1045293
Kurt, S. (2020). Social learning theory: Albert Bandura. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/social-learning-theory-albert-bandura/
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky’s developmental and educational psychology. Psychology Press.
Littlewood, W. (1984). Foreign and second language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Long, Michael (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In De Bot, Kees, Ginsberg, Ralph, & Kramsch, Claire (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
Luan, L., Hong, J. C., Cao, M., Dong, Y., & Hou, X. (2023). Exploring the role of online EFL learners’ perceived social support in their learning engagement: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1703–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1855211
Marty, F. (1981). Reflections on the use of computers in second language acquisition. System, 9(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(81)90023-3
Matthews, C. (1994). Intelligent computer assisted language learning as cognitive science: The choice of syntactic frameworks for language tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(4), 533–556. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-35318-001
McLeod, S. (2016). Albert Bandura’s social learning theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html
Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11–22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol/issue/60134/817680
Panagiotidis, P., Krystalli, P. & Arvanitis, P. (2018). Technology as a motivational factor in foreign language learning. European Journal of Education, 1(3), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i3.p43-52
Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i1.1673
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225.
Savignon, Sandra J. (2000). Communicative language teaching. In Byram Michael (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 125–129). Routledge.
Savignon, Sandra, J. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice: Texts and contexts in second language learning. McGraw-Hill.
Shatz, M. (2007). On the development of the field of language development. In Erika Hoff, & Marilyn Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 1-15). Wiley.
Spector, J.M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learn. Environment, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7
Suharti, D. S., Suherdi, D., & Setyarini, S. (2021). Exploring Students’ Learning Engagement in EFL Online Classroom. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (pp. 139-149). Bandung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.022
Susanti, Y. (2020). The Students’ Engagement in EFL Online Class. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 10(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24843/LJLC.2020.v10.i02.p02
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371
Tomasello, Michael. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
Tribble, C., & Jones, G. (1990). Concordances in the classroom: A resource book for teachers. London: Longman.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1974). The Psychology of Art. The MIT Press
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic Inquiry in Education. Building on the Legacy of Vygotsky. In C. Lee, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygostkian Perspectives on Literacy Research. Constructing Meaning through Collaborative Inquiry (pp. 51-85). Cambridge University Press.
Zhu, Z.T., He, B. (2012) Smart education: new frontier of educational informatization. E-education Research, 12, 1–13.
Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zahra Sadat Roozafzai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
_logo_late_2025.svg.png){kind=logo}
